• My Review of Jo Nesbo’s ‘Nemesis’

    Nemesis by Jo Nesbø My rating: 2 of 5 stars In the parcours of every reading adult, books will be encountered that challenge his perception on a deeper level. Books that connect the loose, live wires of his mind and satisfy an aching in his heart. These are the rare books that manage to do

  • Cher Daniel, ma huitieme lettre a toi

    Cher Daniel, J’ai decide quand meme de t’ecrire en français au lieu de mes lettres habituelles en anglais, car entretemps j’estime que ce sera moins probable que tu apprendra l’anglais dans l’avenir proche. Comme d’habitude je veux te dire a tel point je t’aime. Je pense souvent a toi, bien que ce dernier temps les

  • My review of John Buchan’s ‘The 39 Steps’

    The 39 Steps by John Buchan My rating: 4 of 5 stars What is the ultimate homage one can pay to an author? Surely it is to say that his or her work, when viewed through the lens of time, has lost some of its impact on the modern audience because it has become a

  • My seventh letter to you

    Dear Daniel, It has been a while since I’ve written to you, but that is not to say I have stopped thinking about you. Oh, not at all. On the contrary, you are in my thoughts every day. I hope now that the evenings are getting brighter you will have a chance to play outside

  • Eulogy for a Dungeon Master

    I came across this poem that I’d written ten years ago to mark the passing of Gary Gygax – creator of Dungeons & Dragons Eulogy For A Dungeon Master Countless the basements You transformed to caverns; Nameless the kitchen tables fabled, formed as tabled taverns Where a pimply 16 year old Did his best to

  • Review of Franz Kafka’s ‘The Trial’

    The Trial by Franz Kafka My rating: 5 of 5 stars When you get used to reading inferior books, even a nibble of a great masterpiece can challenge your digestive system in ways that cause stomach cramps. Franz Kafka is no light read. After a diet of heavily processed modern literature, Franz Kafka’s The Trial

  • Happy Easter Daniel

    Dear Daniel, Yet another Easter is coming around the corner and I find myself thinking, once again, of you. There has, in fact, only ever been one Easter that we have spent together. It was the Easter of 2011. I remember I took you to Mass at Notre Dame au Sablon. In all the years

  • The Social Triangle: A new model for political economy

    Divided we tweet It seems that the public debate is divisive as never before. Left versus right. Social Justice Warriors (whatever they are) versus the alt-right (whatever that is). Admittedly, this impression may simply be a result of our unhealthy addiction to social media, which through its Algorithms of Hate and its cloak of anonymity

  • My sixth letter to you (Happy Birthday)

    Dear Daniel, This is just a brief one to wish you a very happy birthday. You are seven today; a big boy now! I want you to know that although I can’t spend the day with you, I have been thinking about you all day. I miss you more than you can know, and look

Load more

As with birth rates, we use data for 4 categories of countries from 1990 to 2015 (100 observations total). We have two explanatory variables, AGE and Y, where AGE is defined as the percentage of the population aged over 65 and Y is per capita GDP.

After eyeballing the scattergrams, we test the following functional form:

d = (minY^a)/Y^a * (1/AGE^g)

Where minY is the constant equal to the smallest value of Y in the series.

Logarithmic transformation gives:

ln(d) = ln(minY^a) – a*ln(Y) – g*ln(AGE)

which we test on the data using OLS. Here are the results:

Adjusted R square: 75.191

Intercept coefficient: 7.37384
t-Stat: 20.4011

Y coefficient: -1.01444
t-Stat: -13.1059

AGE coefficient: 2.0097
t-Stat: 11.5208

The estimated intercept is a good, but not perfect, approximation of ln(minY^a)

Here are the fitted against actual values of the scattergram for death rate against per capita GDP:


While the results are not as good as with the birth rates calculations, it is nevertheless a good enough fit and the explanatory variables have a strong enough confidence factor to be usable in our estimations.


We begin by examining the scatter of data for 100 observations of per capita GDP and per capita emissions for 4 categories of countries, over 25 years (1990 – 2015).

The scatter suggests a cubic functional form, so we test:

GHG = a + b*Y + c*Y^2 + d*Y^3

where GHG are per capita emissions of GHG, and Y is per capita GDP.

The results from OLS regression are:

Adjusted R square: 0.980438073

coefficient a: 1090
t-stat a: 3.06

coefficient b: 0.709310153
t-Stat b: 8.241453

coefficient c: -0.0000047025
t-Stat c: -1.01233

coefficient d: -0.000000000105314
t-Stat d: -1.47005

While the t-scores on the squared and cubed terms are low, the number of observations are also limited.

Here is the plot of the fitted against actual values: